← General Intelligence & Reasoning

Statement & Conclusions / Courses of Action

What "follows" means in this topic — a conclusion must come from the statement alone, without outside knowledge; testing a conclusion for being too strong, too wide or merely restated; the difference between a conclusion, an inference and an assumption; courses of action and the three tests a suggested action must pass; when both actions follow and when neither does; the standard wrong options — with fully worked examples.

📑 Contents (5 sections)

Last reviewed 22 Sept 2026 · 5 min read

The only question being asked

"Does this conclusion follow from the statement?" means: reading only the statement, and nothing you happen to know about the world, is the conclusion necessarily true?

Three tests dispose of most options:

  1. Is it stated or forced? If the statement leaves it open, it does not follow.
  2. Is it too strong? Words such as all, never, only, always, must usually go beyond a statement that was modest.
  3. Is it too wide? A statement about one city does not support a conclusion about the country.
Exam TipThe restatement trap

An option that merely repeats the statement in other words is not a conclusion — it adds nothing. Exam keys treat such options as not following, unless the paper's own instructions say otherwise.

Conclusion, inference, assumption

Term Where it sits Test
Conclusion after the statement must be true if the statement is true
Inference after the statement probably true, drawn from it
Assumption before the statement taken for granted by the writer

An assumption is what the speaker must already believe for their sentence to make sense; a conclusion is what a reader may take away from it. Confusing the two is the commonest error in the whole topic.

Courses of action

A course of action is a step suggested to deal with a problem in the statement. It follows only if it passes all three tests:

  1. Relevance — it addresses the problem actually stated.
  2. Practicality — it can be done by the body that would have to do it.
  3. Proportion — it is not an extreme step where a mild one would do, and not a mild one where the statement describes an emergency.

Actions that are punitive for their own sake, or that ban an activity wholesale, are usually rejected; actions that inform, regulate, repair or investigate are usually accepted.

Worked examples

Worked ExampleExample 1 — too strong

Statement: Most of the students in the class passed the examination. Conclusion: All the students studied hard.

Solution. "Most" does not give "all", and studying hard is nowhere in the statement → does not follow.

Worked ExampleExample 2 — forced

Statement: All the trains from this station run to the east. Conclusion: No train from this station runs to the west.

Solution. Forced by the statement → follows.

Worked ExampleExample 3 — too wide

Statement: The sale of electric scooters in Delhi rose 40% last year. Conclusion: Electric scooters are becoming popular across India.

Solution. One city does not settle a country → does not follow.

Worked ExampleExample 4 — two conclusions

Statement: The company has decided to raise the salaries of its workers from next month. Conclusions: I. The workers were dissatisfied with their salaries. II. The company can afford the rise.

Solution. I is a guess about the reason → does not follow. II is implied by the decision to make it → only II follows.

Worked ExampleExample 5 — an assumption, not a conclusion

Statement: "Use our detergent for whiter clothes" — an advertisement. Which is an assumption? (a) People want whiter clothes. (b) The detergent is cheap.

Solution. (a) — the advertisement makes no sense unless whiteness is wanted. Price is not taken for granted anywhere.

Worked ExampleExample 6 — a course of action

Statement: A large number of road accidents on the highway occur at night at one particular curve. Courses: I. The curve should be re-designed and lit. II. The highway should be closed at night.

Solution. I is relevant, practical and proportionate → follows. II is disproportionate → only I follows.

Worked ExampleExample 7 — both follow

Statement: A sudden outbreak of a water-borne disease has been reported in a locality. Courses: I. The water supply of the locality should be tested at once. II. Residents should be advised to boil drinking water until further notice.

Solution. Both are relevant, practical and immediate → both follow.

Worked ExampleExample 8 — neither follows

Statement: Many students of the school scored poorly in mathematics this year. Courses: I. The mathematics teacher should be dismissed. II. Mathematics should be removed from the syllabus.

Solution. I is punitive before any enquiry; II is absurd → neither follows. (A remedial class would have followed.)

This chapter is in the syllabus of

Open an exam to see where this chapter sits in its syllabus, and to practise it.

✅ Free — no sign-up needed

How ready are you for General Intelligence & Reasoning?

Ten questions from the real syllabus, about five minutes. You will see your score and which subject is holding you back — before you create any account.

10 questions · no timer · no payment