← Environmental Studies & Ecology

The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 & Access and Benefit Sharing

India's Biological Diversity Act, 2002 — its link to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol, the three-tier structure (NBA, SBBs, BMCs), People's Biodiversity Registers, access and benefit sharing, heritage sites, and the 2023 amendment.

📑 Contents (4 sections)

Last reviewed 4 Nov 2026 · Facts as of 4 Nov 2026 · 2 min read

1. Background

  • The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), signed at the Rio Earth Summit (1992), has three objectives: conservation of biodiversity, sustainable use of its components, and fair and equitable sharing of benefits from genetic resources.
  • The Nagoya Protocol (2010) deals with access and benefit sharing (ABS); the Cartagena Protocol (2000) with the safe handling of living modified organisms (LMOs).
  • India passed the Biological Diversity Act in 2002 to implement the CBD; Biological Diversity Rules, 2004.
  • Concerns over biopiracy — patents on neem, turmeric and basmati — strengthened the case for a law.

2. Three-tier structure

Level Body Role
National National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), Chennai (set up 2003) Approves access by foreign persons/companies, IPR applications based on Indian biological resources, transfer of research results abroad; advises the government
State State Biodiversity Boards (SBBs) Regulate commercial use by Indian entities; advise state governments
Local Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs) — in every local body (panchayat, municipality) Prepare People's Biodiversity Registers (PBRs), conserve local biodiversity, levy collection fees

3. Key provisions

  • Prior approval of the NBA for foreigners to obtain biological resources or associated knowledge, and for anyone seeking a patent based on them.
  • Access and benefit sharing — benefits (money, technology, royalties, joint research) go to the benefit claimers — local communities and knowledge holders.
  • Biodiversity Heritage Sites — notified by states in consultation with local bodies (e.g. Nallur Tamarind Grove, Karnataka — the first, 2007).
  • National Biodiversity Fund and state/local funds.
  • Protection of threatened species and repositories for specimens.

4. Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act, 2023

  • Encourages cultivation of medicinal plants and the AYUSH sector; cultivated medicinal plants exempted from some approvals.
  • Decriminalises offences — penalties instead of imprisonment for most violations.
  • Simplifies approval for research and patents; brings more foreign-controlled Indian companies under NBA oversight.
  • Gives local communities a larger role in benefit sharing (benefit-sharing linked to PBRs).
Revision SummaryQuick recap
  • CBD 1992 — conservation, sustainable use, benefit sharing; Nagoya (ABS) 2010; Cartagena (LMOs) 2000.
  • BD Act 2002: NBA (Chennai) → SBBs → BMCs; PBRs at the local level.
  • Foreigners and patent applicants need NBA approval.
  • Biodiversity Heritage Site — first: Nallur Tamarind Grove (2007).
  • 2023 amendment: AYUSH-friendly, decriminalised offences.

Practise this chapter for your exam

This chapter is in the syllabus of 1 exam. Take its chapter test, then the full mock tests of your exam.